Algeria vs Bhutan: Common Good Justifications Score
Algeria
0.898
in 2025
Bhutan
0.881
in 2025
Algeria rank
76th
Bhutan rank
79th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Algeria
- Bhutan
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 0.898 against 0.881 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.017.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Algeria ahead.
Algeria ranks 76th and Bhutan ranks 79th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 5 and Bhutan in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -2.8 | -2.82 | 0.0211 | Algeria |
| 1910s | -2.8 | -0.912 | 1.89 | Bhutan |
| 1920s | -2.8 | -0.912 | 1.89 | Bhutan |
| 1930s | -2.8 | -0.912 | 1.89 | Bhutan |
| 1940s | -2.15 | -0.912 | 1.24 | Bhutan |
| 1950s | -1.02 | -0.2101 | 0.8109 | Bhutan |
| 1960s | 0.9954 | 0.037 | 0.9584 | Algeria |
| 1970s | 0.9338 | 0.037 | 0.8968 | Algeria |
| 1980s | 1.2 | 0.037 | 1.17 | Algeria |
| 1990s | 1.06 | 0.118 | 0.9437 | Algeria |
| 2000s | 0.9331 | 1.02 | 0.0888 | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0.8478 | 1.85 | 1 | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0.573 | 1.51 | 0.9412 | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Algeria or Bhutan?
- Algeria, at 0.898 against 0.881 in Bhutan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Algeria and Bhutan?
- 0.017, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Bhutan?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Algeria and Bhutan rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Algeria ranks 76th and Bhutan ranks 79th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.