Chile vs New Zealand: Collective bargaining coverage — Employees with the right to bargain

Chile
19.3 Percentage of employees
in 2023
New Zealand
18.7 Percentage of employees
in 2024
Chile rank
22nd
New Zealand rank
23rd

Collective bargaining coverage — Employees with the right to bargain over time

  • Chile
  • New Zealand
20406080196019922024

How they compare

Chile currently reports 19.3 Percentage of employees against 18.7 Percentage of employees in New Zealand, a difference of 0.6 Percentage of employees.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was New Zealand ahead.

Chile ranks 22nd and New Zealand ranks 23rd of 29 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile New Zealand Difference Ahead
2010s 16.39 Percentage of employees 18.64 Percentage of employees 2.26 Percentage of employees New Zealand
2020s 18.8 Percentage of employees 18.2 Percentage of employees 0.6 Percentage of employees Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher collective bargaining coverage — employees with the right to bargain, Chile or New Zealand?
Chile, at 19.3 Percentage of employees against 18.7 Percentage of employees in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in collective bargaining coverage — employees with the right to bargain between Chile and New Zealand?
0.6 Percentage of employees, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?
11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for collective bargaining coverage — employees with the right to bargain?
Chile ranks 22nd and New Zealand ranks 23rd of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Collective bargaining coverage — Employees with the right to bargain. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs New Zealand: Collective bargaining coverage — Employees with the right to bargain. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/collective-bargaining-coverage-employees-with-the-right-to-bargain/chile/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/collective-bargaining-coverage-employees-with-the-right-to-bargain/chile/new-zealand/">Chile vs New Zealand: Collective bargaining coverage — Employees with the right to bargain</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Collective bargaining coverage — Employees with the right to bargain
Unit
Percentage of employees
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 1,069 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

The database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts (ICTWSS) was developed by Prof. Jelle Visser at the University of Amsterdam. It was first released in May 2007. In its initial form, the ICTWSS database combined data from various sources and projects with a main focus on trade union in EU and OECD countries, collective bargaining and employment relations in Europe, and social pacts. In 2021, the ICTWSS database was rebranded as the OECD/AIAS ICTWSS database to reflect the joint effort by the OECD and AIAS-HSI to ensure the continuation of the database following Prof. Visser’s retirement. The OECD/AIAS ICTWSS database is publicly available at: http://www.oecd.org/employment/ictwss-database.htm