Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Thailand: Inequality in per capita calorie intake
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.26
in 2020
Thailand
0.26
in 2020
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
88th
Thailand rank
88th
Inequality in per capita calorie intake over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Thailand
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.26 against 0.26 in Thailand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Thailand ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 88th and Thailand ranks 88th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Saint Kitts and Nevis averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.26 | 0.265 | 0.005 | Thailand |
| 2010s | 0.26 | 0.239 | 0.021 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inequality in per capita calorie intake, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Thailand?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.26 against 0.26 in Thailand as of 2020.
- What is the difference in inequality in per capita calorie intake between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Thailand?
- 0, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Thailand?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Thailand rank globally for inequality in per capita calorie intake?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 88th and Thailand ranks 88th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Inequality in per capita calorie intake. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The inequality in dietary calorie intake is measured as the coefficient of variation in energy intake. It represents the spread of intakes around the mean. Higher values represent larger levels of dietary inequality.