Pakistan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Inequality in per capita calorie intake
Pakistan
0.27
in 2020
Trinidad and Tobago
0.27
in 2020
Pakistan rank
77th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
77th
Inequality in per capita calorie intake over time
- Pakistan
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.27 against 0.27 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 77th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 77th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.273 | 0.27 | 0.003 | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0.245 | 0.27 | 0.025 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inequality in per capita calorie intake, Pakistan or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Pakistan, at 0.27 against 0.27 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2020.
- What is the difference in inequality in per capita calorie intake between Pakistan and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Pakistan and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for inequality in per capita calorie intake?
- Pakistan ranks 77th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 77th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Inequality in per capita calorie intake. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The inequality in dietary calorie intake is measured as the coefficient of variation in energy intake. It represents the spread of intakes around the mean. Higher values represent larger levels of dietary inequality.