New Caledonia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Inequality in per capita calorie intake
New Caledonia
0.27
in 2020
Trinidad and Tobago
0.27
in 2020
New Caledonia rank
77th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
77th
Inequality in per capita calorie intake over time
- New Caledonia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0.27 against 0.27 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
New Caledonia ranks 77th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 77th of 185 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inequality in per capita calorie intake, New Caledonia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- New Caledonia, at 0.27 against 0.27 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2020.
- What is the difference in inequality in per capita calorie intake between New Caledonia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do New Caledonia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for inequality in per capita calorie intake?
- New Caledonia ranks 77th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 77th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Inequality in per capita calorie intake. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The inequality in dietary calorie intake is measured as the coefficient of variation in energy intake. It represents the spread of intakes around the mean. Higher values represent larger levels of dietary inequality.