Hong Kong vs Uruguay: Inequality in per capita calorie intake
Hong Kong
0.22
in 2020
Uruguay
0.22
in 2020
Hong Kong rank
133rd
Uruguay rank
133rd
Inequality in per capita calorie intake over time
- Hong Kong
- Uruguay
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.22 against 0.22 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 133rd and Uruguay ranks 133rd of 185 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.01 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.01 | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inequality in per capita calorie intake, Hong Kong or Uruguay?
- Hong Kong, at 0.22 against 0.22 in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in inequality in per capita calorie intake between Hong Kong and Uruguay?
- 0, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Uruguay?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Hong Kong and Uruguay rank globally for inequality in per capita calorie intake?
- Hong Kong ranks 133rd and Uruguay ranks 133rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Inequality in per capita calorie intake. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The inequality in dietary calorie intake is measured as the coefficient of variation in energy intake. It represents the spread of intakes around the mean. Higher values represent larger levels of dietary inequality.