El Salvador vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Inequality in per capita calorie intake
El Salvador
0.26
in 2020
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.26
in 2020
El Salvador rank
88th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
88th
Inequality in per capita calorie intake over time
- El Salvador
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 0.26 against 0.26 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 88th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 88th of 185 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.253 | 0.26 | 0.007 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inequality in per capita calorie intake, El Salvador or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- El Salvador, at 0.26 against 0.26 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2020.
- What is the difference in inequality in per capita calorie intake between El Salvador and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do El Salvador and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for inequality in per capita calorie intake?
- El Salvador ranks 88th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 88th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Inequality in per capita calorie intake. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The inequality in dietary calorie intake is measured as the coefficient of variation in energy intake. It represents the spread of intakes around the mean. Higher values represent larger levels of dietary inequality.