Chile vs Suriname: Coefficient of variation cv in per capita caloric intake
Chile
0.24
in 2020
Suriname
0.24
in 2020
Chile rank
107th
Suriname rank
107th
Coefficient of variation cv in per capita caloric intake over time
- Chile
- Suriname
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.24 against 0.24 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 107th and Suriname ranks 107th of 185 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.02 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0.221 | 0.24 | 0.019 | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coefficient of variation cv in per capita caloric intake, Chile or Suriname?
- Chile, at 0.24 against 0.24 in Suriname as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coefficient of variation cv in per capita caloric intake between Chile and Suriname?
- 0, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Suriname?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Suriname rank globally for coefficient of variation cv in per capita caloric intake?
- Chile ranks 107th and Suriname ranks 107th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coefficient of variation cv in per capita caloric intake. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.