Central African Republic vs South Sudan: Inequality in per capita calorie intake
Central African Republic
0.29
in 2020
South Sudan
0.29
in 2020
Central African Republic rank
49th
South Sudan rank
49th
Inequality in per capita calorie intake over time
- Central African Republic
- South Sudan
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 0.29 against 0.29 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 49th and South Sudan ranks 49th of 185 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.286 | 0.287 | 0.001 | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 0.29 | 0.299 | 0.009 | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inequality in per capita calorie intake, Central African Republic or South Sudan?
- Central African Republic, at 0.29 against 0.29 in South Sudan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in inequality in per capita calorie intake between Central African Republic and South Sudan?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and South Sudan?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Central African Republic and South Sudan rank globally for inequality in per capita calorie intake?
- Central African Republic ranks 49th and South Sudan ranks 49th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Inequality in per capita calorie intake. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The inequality in dietary calorie intake is measured as the coefficient of variation in energy intake. It represents the spread of intakes around the mean. Higher values represent larger levels of dietary inequality.