Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Saint Lucia: Inequality in per capita calorie intake
Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.22
in 2020
Saint Lucia
0.22
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
133rd
Saint Lucia rank
133rd
Inequality in per capita calorie intake over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.22 against 0.22 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 133rd and Saint Lucia ranks 133rd of 185 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.21 | 0.243 | 0.033 | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 0.21 | 0.225 | 0.015 | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inequality in per capita calorie intake, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Saint Lucia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.22 against 0.22 in Saint Lucia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in inequality in per capita calorie intake between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Saint Lucia?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Saint Lucia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Saint Lucia rank globally for inequality in per capita calorie intake?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 133rd and Saint Lucia ranks 133rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Inequality in per capita calorie intake. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The inequality in dietary calorie intake is measured as the coefficient of variation in energy intake. It represents the spread of intakes around the mean. Higher values represent larger levels of dietary inequality.