Antigua and Barbuda vs Suriname: Coefficient of variation cv in per capita caloric intake
Antigua and Barbuda
0.24
in 2020
Suriname
0.24
in 2020
Antigua and Barbuda rank
107th
Suriname rank
107th
Coefficient of variation cv in per capita caloric intake over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Suriname
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.24 against 0.24 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 107th and Suriname ranks 107th of 185 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coefficient of variation cv in per capita caloric intake, Antigua and Barbuda or Suriname?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.24 against 0.24 in Suriname as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coefficient of variation cv in per capita caloric intake between Antigua and Barbuda and Suriname?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Suriname?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Suriname rank globally for coefficient of variation cv in per capita caloric intake?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 107th and Suriname ranks 107th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coefficient of variation cv in per capita caloric intake. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.