Malta vs South Sudan: CO2 emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Transportation
CO2 emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Transportation over time
- Malta
- South Sudan
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.67 against 0.59 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.08.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Malta ranks 148th and South Sudan ranks 151st of 186 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co2 emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - transportation, Malta or South Sudan?
- Malta, at 0.67 against 0.59 in South Sudan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in co2 emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - transportation between Malta and South Sudan?
- 0.08, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and South Sudan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2018.
- How do Malta and South Sudan rank globally for co2 emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - transportation?
- Malta ranks 148th and South Sudan ranks 151st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Climate Watch. 2020. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Available online at: https://www.climatewatchdata.org, published as CO2 emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Transportation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Transportation sector CO2 emissions are generated from the World Resource Institute's Climate Watch. Climate Watch Historical Emission data contains sector-level greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data for 194 countries and the European Union (EU) for the period 1990-2018, including emissions of the six major GHGs from most major sources and sinks. Non-CO2 emissions are expressed in CO2 equivalents using 100-year global warming potential values from IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Climate Watch Historical GHG Emissions data (previously published through CAIT Climate Data Explorer) are derived from several sources. Any use of the Land-Use Change and Forestry or Agriculture indicator should be cited as FAO 2020, FAOSTAT Emissions Database. Any use of CO2 emissions from fuel combustion data should be cited as CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, OECD/IEA, 2020.