Bolivia vs Sri Lanka: CO2 emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Total excluding LUCF
CO2 emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Total excluding LUCF over time
- Bolivia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 22.71 against 21.63 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.08.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 79th and Sri Lanka ranks 81st of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.64 | 6.46 | 1.19 | Bolivia |
| 2000s | 10.28 | 12.35 | 2.07 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 19.38 | 18.29 | 1.09 | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co2 emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - total excluding lucf, Bolivia or Sri Lanka?
- Bolivia, at 22.71 against 21.63 in Sri Lanka as of 2018.
- What is the difference in co2 emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - total excluding lucf between Bolivia and Sri Lanka?
- 1.08, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Sri Lanka?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Bolivia and Sri Lanka rank globally for co2 emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - total excluding lucf?
- Bolivia ranks 79th and Sri Lanka ranks 81st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Climate Watch. 2020. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Available online at: https://www.climatewatchdata.org, published as CO2 emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Total excluding LUCF. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total CO2 emissions (excluding LUCF) are generated from the World Resource Institute's Climate Watch. Climate Watch Historical Emission data contains sector-level greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data for 194 countries and the European Union (EU) for the period 1990-2018, including emissions of the six major GHGs from most major sources and sinks. Non-CO2 emissions are expressed in CO2 equivalents using 100-year global warming potential values from IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Climate Watch Historical GHG Emissions data (previously published through CAIT Climate Data Explorer) are derived from several sources. Any use of the Land-Use Change and Forestry or Agriculture indicator should be cited as FAO 2020, FAOSTAT Emissions Database. Any use of CO2 emissions from fuel combustion data should be cited as CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, OECD/IEA, 2020.