Belarus vs Chile: CO2 emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Bunker Fuels
CO2 emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Bunker Fuels over time
- Belarus
- Chile
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 2.84 against 2.75 in Chile, a difference of 0.09.
Across all 29 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 51st and Chile ranks 52nd of 186 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.67 | 0.72 | 1.95 | Belarus |
| 2000s | 2.17 | 1.22 | 0.947 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 2.41 | 1.95 | 0.46 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co2 emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - bunker fuels, Belarus or Chile?
- Belarus, at 2.84 against 2.75 in Chile as of 2018.
- What is the difference in co2 emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - bunker fuels between Belarus and Chile?
- 0.09, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Chile?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and Chile rank globally for co2 emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - bunker fuels?
- Belarus ranks 51st and Chile ranks 52nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Climate Watch. 2020. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Available online at: https://www.climatewatchdata.org, published as CO2 emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Bunker Fuels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Bunker fuels sector CO2 emissions are generated from the World Resource Institute's Climate Watch. Climate Watch Historical Emission data contains sector-level greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data for 194 countries and the European Union (EU) for the period 1990-2018, including emissions of the six major GHGs from most major sources and sinks. Non-CO2 emissions are expressed in CO2 equivalents using 100-year global warming potential values from IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Climate Watch Historical GHG Emissions data (previously published through CAIT Climate Data Explorer) are derived from several sources. Any use of the Land-Use Change and Forestry or Agriculture indicator should be cited as FAO 2020, FAOSTAT Emissions Database. Any use of CO2 emissions from fuel combustion data should be cited as CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, OECD/IEA, 2020.