Tanzania vs United Arab Emirates: Clientelism Index
Tanzania
0.454
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
0.457
in 2025
Tanzania rank
95th
United Arab Emirates rank
94th
Clientelism Index over time
- Tanzania
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 0.457 against 0.454 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.003.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Tanzania ranks 95th and United Arab Emirates ranks 94th of 176 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Tanzania averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tanzania | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.2598 | 0.744 | 0.4842 | United Arab Emirates |
| 1980s | 0.2714 | 0.702 | 0.4306 | United Arab Emirates |
| 1990s | 0.3926 | 0.702 | 0.3094 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2000s | 0.4878 | 0.6927 | 0.2049 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 0.5125 | 0.5489 | 0.0364 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | 0.5263 | 0.4688 | 0.0575 | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Tanzania or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 0.457 against 0.454 in Tanzania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Tanzania and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.003, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and United Arab Emirates?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
- How do Tanzania and United Arab Emirates rank globally for clientelism index?
- Tanzania ranks 95th and United Arab Emirates ranks 94th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.