Mongolia vs Qatar: Clientelism Index
Mongolia
0.621
in 2025
Qatar
0.632
in 2025
Mongolia rank
57th
Qatar rank
55th
Clientelism Index over time
- Mongolia
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 0.632 against 0.621 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.011.
Across all 115 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 57th and Qatar ranks 55th of 176 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.353 | 0.9549 | 0.6019 | Qatar |
| 1920s | 0.2879 | 0.93 | 0.6421 | Qatar |
| 1930s | 0.277 | 0.93 | 0.653 | Qatar |
| 1940s | 0.285 | 0.93 | 0.645 | Qatar |
| 1950s | 0.1721 | 0.93 | 0.7579 | Qatar |
| 1960s | 0.159 | 0.9255 | 0.7665 | Qatar |
| 1970s | 0.1573 | 0.8916 | 0.7343 | Qatar |
| 1980s | 0.1544 | 0.8583 | 0.7039 | Qatar |
| 1990s | 0.3201 | 0.8614 | 0.5413 | Qatar |
| 2000s | 0.4037 | 0.848 | 0.4443 | Qatar |
| 2010s | 0.4301 | 0.848 | 0.4179 | Qatar |
| 2020s | 0.5847 | 0.7387 | 0.154 | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Mongolia or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 0.632 against 0.621 in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Mongolia and Qatar?
- 0.011, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Qatar?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Mongolia and Qatar rank globally for clientelism index?
- Mongolia ranks 57th and Qatar ranks 55th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.