Laos vs Mauritius: Clientelism Index
Laos
0.298
in 2025
Mauritius
0.314
in 2025
Laos rank
125th
Mauritius rank
123rd
Clientelism Index over time
- Laos
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0.314 against 0.298 in Laos, a difference of 0.016.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Laos's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Laos ahead.
Laos ranks 125th and Mauritius ranks 123rd of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 8 and Mauritius in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.774 | 0.218 | 0.556 | Laos |
| 1910s | 0.774 | 0.218 | 0.556 | Laos |
| 1920s | 0.774 | 0.218 | 0.556 | Laos |
| 1930s | 0.774 | 0.2212 | 0.5528 | Laos |
| 1940s | 0.755 | 0.2353 | 0.5197 | Laos |
| 1950s | 0.7202 | 0.3035 | 0.4167 | Laos |
| 1960s | 0.7499 | 0.3506 | 0.3993 | Laos |
| 1970s | 0.5171 | 0.3318 | 0.1853 | Laos |
| 1980s | 0.2153 | 0.3209 | 0.1056 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 0.1846 | 0.3234 | 0.1388 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0.2009 | 0.3135 | 0.1126 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 0.235 | 0.3709 | 0.1359 | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0.2227 | 0.404 | 0.1813 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Laos or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 0.314 against 0.298 in Laos as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Laos and Mauritius?
- 0.016, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Mauritius?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Laos and Mauritius rank globally for clientelism index?
- Laos ranks 125th and Mauritius ranks 123rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.