Jordan vs Suriname: Clientelism Index
Jordan
0.515
in 2025
Suriname
0.514
in 2025
Jordan rank
81st
Suriname rank
82nd
Clientelism Index over time
- Jordan
- Suriname
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.515 against 0.514 in Suriname, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Suriname ahead.
Jordan ranks 81st and Suriname ranks 82nd of 176 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 7 and Suriname in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.51 | 0.517 | 0.007 | Suriname |
| 1930s | 0.51 | 0.517 | 0.007 | Suriname |
| 1940s | 0.5439 | 0.5183 | 0.0256 | Jordan |
| 1950s | 0.6577 | 0.5601 | 0.0976 | Jordan |
| 1960s | 0.666 | 0.5687 | 0.0973 | Jordan |
| 1970s | 0.6479 | 0.6028 | 0.0451 | Jordan |
| 1980s | 0.6451 | 0.6463 | 0.0012 | Suriname |
| 1990s | 0.6015 | 0.5997 | 0.0018 | Jordan |
| 2000s | 0.584 | 0.5683 | 0.0157 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0.538 | 0.4452 | 0.0928 | Jordan |
| 2020s | 0.5328 | 0.5732 | 0.0403 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Jordan or Suriname?
- Jordan, at 0.515 against 0.514 in Suriname as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Jordan and Suriname?
- 0.001, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Suriname?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Suriname rank globally for clientelism index?
- Jordan ranks 81st and Suriname ranks 82nd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.