Ireland vs Japan: Clientelism Index
Ireland
0.145
in 2025
Japan
0.14
in 2025
Ireland rank
143rd
Japan rank
146th
Clientelism Index over time
- Ireland
- Japan
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 0.145 against 0.14 in Japan, a difference of 0.005.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 107 shared years of data; in 1919 it was Japan ahead.
Ireland ranks 143rd and Japan ranks 146th of 176 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 4 and Japan in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.398 | 0.477 | 0.079 | Japan |
| 1920s | 0.3151 | 0.4423 | 0.1272 | Japan |
| 1930s | 0.3246 | 0.4628 | 0.1382 | Japan |
| 1940s | 0.3372 | 0.4168 | 0.0796 | Japan |
| 1950s | 0.3535 | 0.2903 | 0.0632 | Ireland |
| 1960s | 0.2762 | 0.2384 | 0.0378 | Ireland |
| 1970s | 0.2604 | 0.256 | 0.0044 | Ireland |
| 1980s | 0.2098 | 0.2579 | 0.0481 | Japan |
| 1990s | 0.184 | 0.2444 | 0.0604 | Japan |
| 2000s | 0.194 | 0.1944 | 0.0004 | Japan |
| 2010s | 0.1643 | 0.1846 | 0.0203 | Japan |
| 2020s | 0.158 | 0.1578 | 0.0002 | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Ireland or Japan?
- Ireland, at 0.145 against 0.14 in Japan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Ireland and Japan?
- 0.005, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Japan?
- 107 years are reported by both, from 1919 to 2025.
- How do Ireland and Japan rank globally for clientelism index?
- Ireland ranks 143rd and Japan ranks 146th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.