Guyana vs North Korea: Clientelism Index

Guyana
0.511
in 2025
North Korea
0.511
in 2025
Guyana rank
83rd
North Korea rank
83rd

Clientelism Index over time

  • Guyana
  • North Korea
00.20.40.60.8190019622025

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 0.511 against 0.511 in North Korea, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 81 shared years of data; in 1945 it was North Korea ahead.

Guyana ranks 83rd and North Korea ranks 83rd of 176 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 5 and North Korea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana North Korea Difference Ahead
1940s 0.483 0.6846 0.2016 North Korea
1950s 0.5017 0.5966 0.0949 North Korea
1960s 0.5483 0.5114 0.0369 Guyana
1970s 0.5923 0.5612 0.0311 Guyana
1980s 0.5626 0.569 0.0064 North Korea
1990s 0.5412 0.5363 0.0049 Guyana
2000s 0.5006 0.4917 0.0089 Guyana
2010s 0.4705 0.4809 0.0104 North Korea
2020s 0.5585 0.511 0.0475 Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher clientelism index, Guyana or North Korea?
Guyana, at 0.511 against 0.511 in North Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in clientelism index between Guyana and North Korea?
0, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and North Korea?
81 years are reported by both, from 1945 to 2025.
How do Guyana and North Korea rank globally for clientelism index?
Guyana ranks 83rd and North Korea ranks 83rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Clientelism Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 24,366 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.