Guinea vs Suriname: Clientelism Index
Guinea
0.536
in 2025
Suriname
0.514
in 2025
Guinea rank
80th
Suriname rank
82nd
Clientelism Index over time
- Guinea
- Suriname
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 0.536 against 0.514 in Suriname, a difference of 0.022.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 80th and Suriname ranks 82nd of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 9 and Suriname in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.947 | 0.517 | 0.43 | Guinea |
| 1910s | 0.947 | 0.517 | 0.43 | Guinea |
| 1920s | 0.947 | 0.517 | 0.43 | Guinea |
| 1930s | 0.947 | 0.517 | 0.43 | Guinea |
| 1940s | 0.7695 | 0.5183 | 0.2512 | Guinea |
| 1950s | 0.4591 | 0.5601 | 0.101 | Suriname |
| 1960s | 0.3491 | 0.5687 | 0.2196 | Suriname |
| 1970s | 0.353 | 0.6028 | 0.2498 | Suriname |
| 1980s | 0.4782 | 0.6463 | 0.1681 | Suriname |
| 1990s | 0.7145 | 0.5997 | 0.1148 | Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.7864 | 0.5683 | 0.2181 | Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.6537 | 0.4452 | 0.2085 | Guinea |
| 2020s | 0.5758 | 0.5732 | 0.0027 | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Guinea or Suriname?
- Guinea, at 0.536 against 0.514 in Suriname as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Guinea and Suriname?
- 0.022, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Suriname?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Guinea and Suriname rank globally for clientelism index?
- Guinea ranks 80th and Suriname ranks 82nd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.