Guinea vs North Korea: Clientelism Index
Guinea
0.536
in 2025
North Korea
0.511
in 2025
Guinea rank
80th
North Korea rank
83rd
Clientelism Index over time
- Guinea
- North Korea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 0.536 against 0.511 in North Korea, a difference of 0.025.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 81 shared years of data; in 1945 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 80th and North Korea ranks 83rd of 176 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 4 and North Korea in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | North Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0.6068 | 0.6846 | 0.0778 | North Korea |
| 1950s | 0.4591 | 0.5966 | 0.1375 | North Korea |
| 1960s | 0.3491 | 0.5114 | 0.1623 | North Korea |
| 1970s | 0.353 | 0.5612 | 0.2082 | North Korea |
| 1980s | 0.4782 | 0.569 | 0.0908 | North Korea |
| 1990s | 0.7145 | 0.5363 | 0.1782 | Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.7864 | 0.4917 | 0.2947 | Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.6537 | 0.4809 | 0.1728 | Guinea |
| 2020s | 0.5758 | 0.511 | 0.0648 | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Guinea or North Korea?
- Guinea, at 0.536 against 0.511 in North Korea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Guinea and North Korea?
- 0.025, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and North Korea?
- 81 years are reported by both, from 1945 to 2025.
- How do Guinea and North Korea rank globally for clientelism index?
- Guinea ranks 80th and North Korea ranks 83rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.