Djibouti vs Togo: Clientelism Index
Djibouti
0.697
in 2025
Togo
0.664
in 2025
Djibouti rank
46th
Togo rank
49th
Clientelism Index over time
- Djibouti
- Togo
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 0.697 against 0.664 in Togo, a difference of 0.033.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 46th and Togo ranks 49th of 176 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 10 and Togo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.863 | 0.599 | 0.264 | Djibouti |
| 1920s | 0.863 | 0.599 | 0.264 | Djibouti |
| 1930s | 0.863 | 0.599 | 0.264 | Djibouti |
| 1940s | 0.8217 | 0.5546 | 0.2671 | Djibouti |
| 1950s | 0.7773 | 0.5259 | 0.2514 | Djibouti |
| 1960s | 0.7839 | 0.7073 | 0.0766 | Djibouti |
| 1970s | 0.8114 | 0.904 | 0.0926 | Togo |
| 1980s | 0.7919 | 0.8356 | 0.0437 | Togo |
| 1990s | 0.748 | 0.7152 | 0.0328 | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 0.7213 | 0.6812 | 0.0401 | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 0.691 | 0.5894 | 0.1016 | Djibouti |
| 2020s | 0.6873 | 0.6262 | 0.0612 | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Djibouti or Togo?
- Djibouti, at 0.697 against 0.664 in Togo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Djibouti and Togo?
- 0.033, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Togo?
- 110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
- How do Djibouti and Togo rank globally for clientelism index?
- Djibouti ranks 46th and Togo ranks 49th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.