Djibouti vs Nigeria: Clientelism Index
Djibouti
0.697
in 2025
Nigeria
0.702
in 2025
Djibouti rank
46th
Nigeria rank
45th
Clientelism Index over time
- Djibouti
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 0.702 against 0.697 in Djibouti, a difference of 0.005.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 112 shared years of data; in 1914 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 46th and Nigeria ranks 45th of 176 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 4 and Nigeria in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.863 | 0.859 | 0.004 | Djibouti |
| 1920s | 0.863 | 0.8126 | 0.0504 | Djibouti |
| 1930s | 0.863 | 0.801 | 0.062 | Djibouti |
| 1940s | 0.8217 | 0.8162 | 0.0055 | Djibouti |
| 1950s | 0.7773 | 0.8389 | 0.0616 | Nigeria |
| 1960s | 0.7839 | 0.8459 | 0.062 | Nigeria |
| 1970s | 0.8114 | 0.8533 | 0.0419 | Nigeria |
| 1980s | 0.7919 | 0.8961 | 0.1042 | Nigeria |
| 1990s | 0.748 | 0.8546 | 0.1066 | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 0.7213 | 0.8332 | 0.1119 | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 0.691 | 0.7821 | 0.0911 | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 0.6873 | 0.7898 | 0.1025 | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Djibouti or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 0.702 against 0.697 in Djibouti as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Djibouti and Nigeria?
- 0.005, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Nigeria?
- 112 years are reported by both, from 1914 to 2025.
- How do Djibouti and Nigeria rank globally for clientelism index?
- Djibouti ranks 46th and Nigeria ranks 45th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.