Czechia vs Finland: Clientelism Index
Czechia
0.068
in 2025
Finland
0.069
in 2025
Czechia rank
162nd
Finland rank
161st
Clientelism Index over time
- Czechia
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0.069 against 0.068 in Czechia, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 162nd and Finland ranks 161st of 176 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 11 and Finland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.358 | 0.1125 | 0.2455 | Czechia |
| 1920s | 0.2115 | 0.0971 | 0.1144 | Czechia |
| 1930s | 0.2472 | 0.1023 | 0.1449 | Czechia |
| 1940s | 0.6201 | 0.0966 | 0.5235 | Czechia |
| 1950s | 0.3178 | 0.1159 | 0.2019 | Czechia |
| 1960s | 0.3202 | 0.1032 | 0.217 | Czechia |
| 1970s | 0.3203 | 0.0709 | 0.2494 | Czechia |
| 1980s | 0.2795 | 0.0774 | 0.2021 | Czechia |
| 1990s | 0.0699 | 0.0752 | 0.0053 | Finland |
| 2000s | 0.0651 | 0.0602 | 0.0049 | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.0981 | 0.0567 | 0.0414 | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.0895 | 0.0603 | 0.0292 | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Czechia or Finland?
- Finland, at 0.069 against 0.068 in Czechia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Czechia and Finland?
- 0.001, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Finland?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Czechia and Finland rank globally for clientelism index?
- Czechia ranks 162nd and Finland ranks 161st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.