Cuba vs Zambia: Clientelism Index
Cuba
0.506
in 2025
Zambia
0.488
in 2025
Cuba rank
86th
Zambia rank
89th
Clientelism Index over time
- Cuba
- Zambia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.506 against 0.488 in Zambia, a difference of 0.018.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 86th and Zambia ranks 89th of 176 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 11 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.7944 | 0.5596 | 0.2349 | Cuba |
| 1920s | 0.7824 | 0.4695 | 0.3129 | Cuba |
| 1930s | 0.6949 | 0.3272 | 0.3677 | Cuba |
| 1940s | 0.5725 | 0.2973 | 0.2752 | Cuba |
| 1950s | 0.546 | 0.2894 | 0.2566 | Cuba |
| 1960s | 0.5992 | 0.2503 | 0.3489 | Cuba |
| 1970s | 0.604 | 0.2909 | 0.3131 | Cuba |
| 1980s | 0.604 | 0.3756 | 0.2284 | Cuba |
| 1990s | 0.5253 | 0.4134 | 0.1119 | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.4944 | 0.4901 | 0.0043 | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.4823 | 0.5745 | 0.0922 | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0.4882 | 0.48 | 0.0082 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Cuba or Zambia?
- Cuba, at 0.506 against 0.488 in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Cuba and Zambia?
- 0.018, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zambia?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and Zambia rank globally for clientelism index?
- Cuba ranks 86th and Zambia ranks 89th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.