Cuba vs Oman: Clientelism Index
Cuba
0.506
in 2025
Oman
0.501
in 2025
Cuba rank
86th
Oman rank
88th
Clientelism Index over time
- Cuba
- Oman
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.506 against 0.501 in Oman, a difference of 0.005.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Oman ahead.
Cuba ranks 86th and Oman ranks 88th of 176 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.7393 | 0.834 | 0.0947 | Oman |
| 1910s | 0.7942 | 0.834 | 0.0398 | Oman |
| 1920s | 0.7824 | 0.834 | 0.0516 | Oman |
| 1930s | 0.6949 | 0.834 | 0.1391 | Oman |
| 1940s | 0.5725 | 0.834 | 0.2615 | Oman |
| 1950s | 0.546 | 0.834 | 0.288 | Oman |
| 1960s | 0.5992 | 0.826 | 0.2268 | Oman |
| 1970s | 0.604 | 0.6326 | 0.0286 | Oman |
| 1980s | 0.604 | 0.62 | 0.016 | Oman |
| 1990s | 0.5253 | 0.62 | 0.0947 | Oman |
| 2000s | 0.4944 | 0.548 | 0.0536 | Oman |
| 2010s | 0.4823 | 0.5232 | 0.0409 | Oman |
| 2020s | 0.4882 | 0.5042 | 0.016 | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Cuba or Oman?
- Cuba, at 0.506 against 0.501 in Oman as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Cuba and Oman?
- 0.005, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Oman?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and Oman rank globally for clientelism index?
- Cuba ranks 86th and Oman ranks 88th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.