Central African Republic vs Uzbekistan: Clientelism Index
Central African Republic
0.64
in 2025
Uzbekistan
0.636
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
53rd
Uzbekistan rank
54th
Clientelism Index over time
- Central African Republic
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 0.64 against 0.636 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.004.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1920 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 53rd and Uzbekistan ranks 54th of 176 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 4 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.813 | 0.97 | 0.157 | Uzbekistan |
| 1990s | 0.8037 | 0.5557 | 0.248 | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | 0.8263 | 0.6949 | 0.1314 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 0.7885 | 0.7107 | 0.0778 | Central African Republic |
| 2020s | 0.6965 | 0.6648 | 0.0317 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Central African Republic or Uzbekistan?
- Central African Republic, at 0.64 against 0.636 in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Central African Republic and Uzbekistan?
- 0.004, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Uzbekistan?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Uzbekistan rank globally for clientelism index?
- Central African Republic ranks 53rd and Uzbekistan ranks 54th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.