Cambodia vs Serbia: Clientelism Index
Cambodia
0.762
in 2025
Serbia
0.756
in 2025
Cambodia rank
26th
Serbia rank
28th
Clientelism Index over time
- Cambodia
- Serbia
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0.762 against 0.756 in Serbia, a difference of 0.006.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 26th and Serbia ranks 28th of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 12 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.878 | 0.7159 | 0.1621 | Cambodia |
| 1910s | 0.878 | 0.7258 | 0.1522 | Cambodia |
| 1920s | 0.878 | 0.6818 | 0.1962 | Cambodia |
| 1930s | 0.878 | 0.6722 | 0.2058 | Cambodia |
| 1940s | 0.8542 | 0.6152 | 0.239 | Cambodia |
| 1950s | 0.7105 | 0.4123 | 0.2982 | Cambodia |
| 1960s | 0.65 | 0.4121 | 0.2379 | Cambodia |
| 1970s | 0.8442 | 0.4098 | 0.4344 | Cambodia |
| 1980s | 0.7832 | 0.4026 | 0.3806 | Cambodia |
| 1990s | 0.7391 | 0.6669 | 0.0722 | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 0.7477 | 0.5676 | 0.1801 | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 0.7415 | 0.67 | 0.0715 | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 0.7425 | 0.7655 | 0.023 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Cambodia or Serbia?
- Cambodia, at 0.762 against 0.756 in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Cambodia and Serbia?
- 0.006, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Serbia?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Cambodia and Serbia rank globally for clientelism index?
- Cambodia ranks 26th and Serbia ranks 28th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.