Bolivia vs Malaysia: Clientelism Index
Bolivia
0.419
in 2025
Malaysia
0.43
in 2025
Bolivia rank
104th
Malaysia rank
102nd
Clientelism Index over time
- Bolivia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 0.43 against 0.419 in Bolivia, a difference of 0.011.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 104th and Malaysia ranks 102nd of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 8 and Malaysia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.8677 | 0.741 | 0.1267 | Bolivia |
| 1910s | 0.8724 | 0.741 | 0.1314 | Bolivia |
| 1920s | 0.8762 | 0.741 | 0.1352 | Bolivia |
| 1930s | 0.858 | 0.741 | 0.117 | Bolivia |
| 1940s | 0.8734 | 0.6921 | 0.1813 | Bolivia |
| 1950s | 0.7882 | 0.4804 | 0.3078 | Bolivia |
| 1960s | 0.8381 | 0.4935 | 0.3446 | Bolivia |
| 1970s | 0.828 | 0.4974 | 0.3306 | Bolivia |
| 1980s | 0.593 | 0.6305 | 0.0375 | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 0.5693 | 0.6609 | 0.0916 | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 0.4223 | 0.6328 | 0.2105 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 0.3124 | 0.4771 | 0.1647 | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 0.3393 | 0.4413 | 0.102 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Bolivia or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 0.43 against 0.419 in Bolivia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Bolivia and Malaysia?
- 0.011, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Malaysia?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Bolivia and Malaysia rank globally for clientelism index?
- Bolivia ranks 104th and Malaysia ranks 102nd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.