Benin vs North Korea: Clientelism Index

Benin
0.51
in 2025
North Korea
0.511
in 2025
Benin rank
85th
North Korea rank
83rd

Clientelism Index over time

  • Benin
  • North Korea
0.20.40.60.8190019622025

How they compare

North Korea currently reports 0.511 against 0.51 in Benin, a difference of 0.001.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 81 shared years of data; in 1945 it was North Korea ahead.

Benin ranks 85th and North Korea ranks 83rd of 176 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 2 and North Korea in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin North Korea Difference Ahead
1940s 0.613 0.6846 0.0716 North Korea
1950s 0.469 0.5966 0.1276 North Korea
1960s 0.2374 0.5114 0.274 North Korea
1970s 0.2553 0.5612 0.3059 North Korea
1980s 0.2497 0.569 0.3193 North Korea
1990s 0.44 0.5363 0.0963 North Korea
2000s 0.5396 0.4917 0.0479 Benin
2010s 0.4931 0.4809 0.0122 Benin
2020s 0.4632 0.511 0.0478 North Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher clientelism index, Benin or North Korea?
North Korea, at 0.511 against 0.51 in Benin as of 2025.
What is the difference in clientelism index between Benin and North Korea?
0.001, with North Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and North Korea?
81 years are reported by both, from 1945 to 2025.
How do Benin and North Korea rank globally for clientelism index?
Benin ranks 85th and North Korea ranks 83rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Clientelism Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 24,366 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.