Benin vs Guyana: Clientelism Index
Benin
0.51
in 2025
Guyana
0.511
in 2025
Benin rank
85th
Guyana rank
83rd
Clientelism Index over time
- Benin
- Guyana
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 0.511 against 0.51 in Benin, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Benin ahead.
Benin ranks 85th and Guyana ranks 83rd of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 7 and Guyana in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.613 | 0.5014 | 0.1116 | Benin |
| 1910s | 0.613 | 0.4876 | 0.1254 | Benin |
| 1920s | 0.613 | 0.5017 | 0.1113 | Benin |
| 1930s | 0.613 | 0.4874 | 0.1256 | Benin |
| 1940s | 0.613 | 0.483 | 0.13 | Benin |
| 1950s | 0.469 | 0.5017 | 0.0327 | Guyana |
| 1960s | 0.2374 | 0.5483 | 0.3109 | Guyana |
| 1970s | 0.2553 | 0.5923 | 0.337 | Guyana |
| 1980s | 0.2497 | 0.5626 | 0.3129 | Guyana |
| 1990s | 0.44 | 0.5412 | 0.1012 | Guyana |
| 2000s | 0.5396 | 0.5006 | 0.039 | Benin |
| 2010s | 0.4931 | 0.4705 | 0.0226 | Benin |
| 2020s | 0.4632 | 0.5585 | 0.0953 | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Benin or Guyana?
- Guyana, at 0.511 against 0.51 in Benin as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Benin and Guyana?
- 0.001, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Guyana?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Benin and Guyana rank globally for clientelism index?
- Benin ranks 85th and Guyana ranks 83rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.