Angola vs Serbia: Clientelism Index
Angola
0.742
in 2025
Serbia
0.756
in 2025
Angola rank
31st
Serbia rank
28th
Clientelism Index over time
- Angola
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0.756 against 0.742 in Angola, a difference of 0.014.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Serbia ahead.
Angola ranks 31st and Serbia ranks 28th of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 8 and Serbia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.627 | 0.7159 | 0.0889 | Serbia |
| 1910s | 0.627 | 0.7258 | 0.0988 | Serbia |
| 1920s | 0.627 | 0.6818 | 0.0548 | Serbia |
| 1930s | 0.627 | 0.6722 | 0.0452 | Serbia |
| 1940s | 0.627 | 0.6152 | 0.0118 | Angola |
| 1950s | 0.627 | 0.4123 | 0.2147 | Angola |
| 1960s | 0.4929 | 0.4121 | 0.0808 | Angola |
| 1970s | 0.5249 | 0.4098 | 0.1151 | Angola |
| 1980s | 0.59 | 0.4026 | 0.1874 | Angola |
| 1990s | 0.778 | 0.6669 | 0.1111 | Angola |
| 2000s | 0.7211 | 0.5676 | 0.1535 | Angola |
| 2010s | 0.7087 | 0.67 | 0.0387 | Angola |
| 2020s | 0.7065 | 0.7655 | 0.059 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Angola or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0.756 against 0.742 in Angola as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Angola and Serbia?
- 0.014, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Serbia?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Serbia rank globally for clientelism index?
- Angola ranks 31st and Serbia ranks 28th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.