Angola vs Guatemala: Clientelism Index
Angola
0.742
in 2025
Guatemala
0.742
in 2025
Angola rank
31st
Guatemala rank
31st
Clientelism Index over time
- Angola
- Guatemala
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0.742 against 0.742 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Guatemala ahead.
Angola ranks 31st and Guatemala ranks 31st of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 11.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.627 | 0.9461 | 0.3191 | Guatemala |
| 1910s | 0.627 | 0.9575 | 0.3305 | Guatemala |
| 1920s | 0.627 | 0.867 | 0.24 | Guatemala |
| 1930s | 0.627 | 0.9147 | 0.2877 | Guatemala |
| 1940s | 0.627 | 0.6683 | 0.0413 | Guatemala |
| 1950s | 0.627 | 0.5727 | 0.0543 | Angola |
| 1960s | 0.4929 | 0.772 | 0.2791 | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 0.5249 | 0.7907 | 0.2658 | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 0.59 | 0.6517 | 0.0617 | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 0.778 | 0.6503 | 0.1277 | Angola |
| 2000s | 0.7211 | 0.7494 | 0.0283 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.7087 | 0.7834 | 0.0747 | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 0.7065 | 0.7925 | 0.086 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Angola or Guatemala?
- Angola, at 0.742 against 0.742 in Guatemala as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Angola and Guatemala?
- 0, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Guatemala?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Guatemala rank globally for clientelism index?
- Angola ranks 31st and Guatemala ranks 31st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.