Albania vs Cambodia: Clientelism Index
Albania
0.769
in 2025
Cambodia
0.762
in 2025
Albania rank
25th
Cambodia rank
26th
Clientelism Index over time
- Albania
- Cambodia
How they compare
Albania currently reports 0.769 against 0.762 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.007.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 114 shared years of data; in 1912 it was Cambodia ahead.
Albania ranks 25th and Cambodia ranks 26th of 176 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.7731 | 0.878 | 0.1049 | Cambodia |
| 1920s | 0.6648 | 0.878 | 0.2132 | Cambodia |
| 1930s | 0.6329 | 0.878 | 0.2451 | Cambodia |
| 1940s | 0.4044 | 0.8542 | 0.4498 | Cambodia |
| 1950s | 0.1658 | 0.7105 | 0.5447 | Cambodia |
| 1960s | 0.1559 | 0.65 | 0.4941 | Cambodia |
| 1970s | 0.1549 | 0.8442 | 0.6893 | Cambodia |
| 1980s | 0.173 | 0.7832 | 0.6102 | Cambodia |
| 1990s | 0.5768 | 0.7391 | 0.1623 | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 0.6308 | 0.7477 | 0.1169 | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 0.7001 | 0.7415 | 0.0414 | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 0.7375 | 0.7425 | 0.005 | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Albania or Cambodia?
- Albania, at 0.769 against 0.762 in Cambodia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Albania and Cambodia?
- 0.007, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Cambodia?
- 114 years are reported by both, from 1912 to 2025.
- How do Albania and Cambodia rank globally for clientelism index?
- Albania ranks 25th and Cambodia ranks 26th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.