French Southern Territories vs Nauru: Chlorophyll-a deviation from the global average
French Southern Territories
10.1%
in 2021
Nauru
11.0%
in 2022
French Southern Territories rank
20th
Nauru rank
18th
Chlorophyll-a deviation from the global average over time
- French Southern Territories
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 11.0% against 10.1% in French Southern Territories, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes Nauru's figure about 1.1 times French Southern Territories's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Nauru ahead.
French Southern Territories ranks 20th and Nauru ranks 18th of 195 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Southern Territories | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.3% | 14.2% | 10.9% | Nauru |
| 2010s | 3.8% | 13.6% | 9.8% | Nauru |
| 2020s | 7.5% | 44.6% | 37.1% | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviation from the global average, French Southern Territories or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 11.0% against 10.1% in French Southern Territories as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviation from the global average between French Southern Territories and Nauru?
- 0.9%, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Southern Territories and Nauru?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2021.
- How do French Southern Territories and Nauru rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviation from the global average?
- French Southern Territories ranks 20th and Nauru ranks 18th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Statistics Division – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chlorophyll-a deviation from the global average. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%).