Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Chlorophyll a deviation from the global average

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
0.19
in 2022
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.21
in 2022
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
143rd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
141st

Chlorophyll a deviation from the global average over time

  • Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
051015200520132022

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.21 against 0.19 in Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, a difference of 0.02.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 143rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 141st of 186 countries.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 3.63 0.668 2.96 Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
2010s 2.59 0.408 2.19 Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
2020s 1.54 0.4067 1.13 Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chlorophyll a deviation from the global average, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.21 against 0.19 in Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba as of 2022.
What is the difference in chlorophyll a deviation from the global average between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.02, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for chlorophyll a deviation from the global average?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 143rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 141st of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Chlorophyll a deviation from the global average. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Chlorophyll a deviation from the global average. Statizoid, drawing on Our World in Data. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviation-from-the-global-average/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviation-from-the-global-average/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Chlorophyll a deviation from the global average</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chlorophyll a deviation from the global average
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
193 places, 3,410 data points, 2005–2022
Last refreshed