Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Reunion: Chlorophyll-a deviation from the global average
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
0.2%
in 2022
Reunion
0.2%
in 2022
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
146th
Reunion rank
146th
Chlorophyll-a deviation from the global average over time
- Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
- Reunion
How they compare
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Reunion, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Reunion ahead.
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 146th and Reunion ranks 146th of 193 countries.
Reunion has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba | Reunion | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.6% | 4.2% | 0.5% | Reunion |
| 2010s | 2.6% | 2.9% | 0.3% | Reunion |
| 2020s | 1.5% | 6.1% | 4.5% | Reunion |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviation from the global average, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Reunion?
- Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Reunion as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviation from the global average between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Reunion?
- 0.0%, with Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Reunion?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Reunion rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviation from the global average?
- Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 146th and Reunion ranks 146th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Statistics Division – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chlorophyll-a deviation from the global average. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%)