Namibia vs Uruguay: Cases of paralytic polio from wild polioviruses
Namibia
0
in 2023
Uruguay
0
in 2023
Namibia rank
3rd
Uruguay rank
3rd
Cases of paralytic polio from wild polioviruses over time
- Namibia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 against 0 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Uruguay ahead.
Namibia ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 3rd of 173 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.11 | 0 | 2.11 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cases of paralytic polio from wild polioviruses, Namibia or Uruguay?
- Namibia, at 0 against 0 in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cases of paralytic polio from wild polioviruses between Namibia and Uruguay?
- 0, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Uruguay?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Namibia and Uruguay rank globally for cases of paralytic polio from wild polioviruses?
- Namibia ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 3rd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Cases of paralytic polio from wild polioviruses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.