Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture

Rwanda
8,392 metric tons
in 2024
Zimbabwe
8,224 metric tons
in 2024
Rwanda rank
91st
Zimbabwe rank
92nd

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture over time

  • Rwanda
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196019922024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 8,392 metric tons against 8,224 metric tons in Zimbabwe, a difference of 168 metric tons.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Rwanda ranks 91st and Zimbabwe ranks 92nd of 215 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons 0 metric tons 0 metric tons
1970s 3.8 metric tons 26.2 metric tons 22.4 metric tons Zimbabwe
1980s 40.1 metric tons 126.5 metric tons 86.4 metric tons Zimbabwe
1990s 111.3 metric tons 254.6 metric tons 143.3 metric tons Zimbabwe
2000s 297.51 metric tons 3,051 metric tons 2,753 metric tons Zimbabwe
2010s 1,752 metric tons 17,804 metric tons 16,053 metric tons Zimbabwe
2020s 6,606 metric tons 9,704 metric tons 3,098 metric tons Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, Rwanda or Zimbabwe?
Rwanda, at 8,392 metric tons against 8,224 metric tons in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture between Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
168 metric tons, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Rwanda and Zimbabwe rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture?
Rwanda ranks 91st and Zimbabwe ranks 92nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/capture-and-aquaculture-production/rwanda/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/capture-and-aquaculture-production/rwanda/zimbabwe/">Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture
Unit
metric tons
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
215 places, 12,849 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Aquaculture is the farming of aquatic organisms including fish, molluscs, crustaceans and aquatic plants. Capture fishery production is the volume of wild fish catches landed for all commercial, industrial, recreational and subsistence purposes.