Mauritius vs Qatar: Calorie supply by food group
Mauritius
2,692 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Qatar
2,678 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Mauritius rank
25th
Qatar rank
26th
Calorie supply by food group over time
- Mauritius
- Qatar
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 2,692 kilocalories per day per capita against 2,678 kilocalories per day per capita in Qatar, a difference of 14 kilocalories per day per capita.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Qatar ahead.
Mauritius ranks 25th and Qatar ranks 26th of 192 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,514 kilocalories per day per capita | 2,748 kilocalories per day per capita | 234.67 kilocalories per day per capita | Qatar |
| 2020s | 2,632 kilocalories per day per capita | 2,675 kilocalories per day per capita | 42.6 kilocalories per day per capita | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calorie supply by food group, Mauritius or Qatar?
- Mauritius, at 2,692 kilocalories per day per capita against 2,678 kilocalories per day per capita in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in calorie supply by food group between Mauritius and Qatar?
- 14 kilocalories per day per capita, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Qatar?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Qatar rank globally for calorie supply by food group?
- Mauritius ranks 25th and Qatar ranks 26th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Calorie supply by food group. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.