Latvia vs Sudan: Calorie supply by food group
Latvia
2,223 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Sudan
2,224 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2022
Latvia rank
134th
Sudan rank
133rd
Calorie supply by food group over time
- Latvia
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 2,224 kilocalories per day per capita against 2,223 kilocalories per day per capita in Latvia, a difference of 1 kilocalories per day per capita.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 134th and Sudan ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,267 kilocalories per day per capita | 2,150 kilocalories per day per capita | 116.98 kilocalories per day per capita | Latvia |
| 2020s | 2,185 kilocalories per day per capita | 2,202 kilocalories per day per capita | 16.74 kilocalories per day per capita | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calorie supply by food group, Latvia or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 2,224 kilocalories per day per capita against 2,223 kilocalories per day per capita in Latvia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in calorie supply by food group between Latvia and Sudan?
- 1 kilocalories per day per capita, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do Latvia and Sudan rank globally for calorie supply by food group?
- Latvia ranks 134th and Sudan ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Calorie supply by food group. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.