Burundi vs Chad: Calorie supply by food group
Burundi
1,660 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2022
Chad
1,741 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2022
Burundi rank
190th
Chad rank
188th
Calorie supply by food group over time
- Burundi
- Chad
How they compare
Chad currently reports 1,741 kilocalories per day per capita against 1,660 kilocalories per day per capita in Burundi, a difference of 81 kilocalories per day per capita.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 190th and Chad ranks 188th of 192 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,540 kilocalories per day per capita | 1,946 kilocalories per day per capita | 406.46 kilocalories per day per capita | Chad |
| 2020s | 1,671 kilocalories per day per capita | 1,780 kilocalories per day per capita | 109.73 kilocalories per day per capita | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calorie supply by food group, Burundi or Chad?
- Chad, at 1,741 kilocalories per day per capita against 1,660 kilocalories per day per capita in Burundi as of 2022.
- What is the difference in calorie supply by food group between Burundi and Chad?
- 81 kilocalories per day per capita, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Chad?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Burundi and Chad rank globally for calorie supply by food group?
- Burundi ranks 190th and Chad ranks 188th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Calorie supply by food group. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.