Bhutan vs Israel: Calorie supply by food group
Bhutan
2,863 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Israel
2,831 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Bhutan rank
10th
Israel rank
12th
Calorie supply by food group over time
- Bhutan
- Israel
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 2,863 kilocalories per day per capita against 2,831 kilocalories per day per capita in Israel, a difference of 32 kilocalories per day per capita.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 10th and Israel ranks 12th of 191 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,914 kilocalories per day per capita | 2,870 kilocalories per day per capita | 44.09 kilocalories per day per capita | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 2,917 kilocalories per day per capita | 2,888 kilocalories per day per capita | 28.66 kilocalories per day per capita | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calorie supply by food group, Bhutan or Israel?
- Bhutan, at 2,863 kilocalories per day per capita against 2,831 kilocalories per day per capita in Israel as of 2023.
- What is the difference in calorie supply by food group between Bhutan and Israel?
- 32 kilocalories per day per capita, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Israel?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Israel rank globally for calorie supply by food group?
- Bhutan ranks 10th and Israel ranks 12th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Calorie supply by food group. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.