Bhutan vs Ghana: Calorie supply by food group
Bhutan
2,863 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Ghana
2,978 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Bhutan rank
10th
Ghana rank
7th
Calorie supply by food group over time
- Bhutan
- Ghana
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 2,978 kilocalories per day per capita against 2,863 kilocalories per day per capita in Bhutan, a difference of 115 kilocalories per day per capita.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 10th and Ghana ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Ghana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,914 kilocalories per day per capita | 2,898 kilocalories per day per capita | 15.8 kilocalories per day per capita | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 2,917 kilocalories per day per capita | 2,961 kilocalories per day per capita | 44.51 kilocalories per day per capita | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calorie supply by food group, Bhutan or Ghana?
- Ghana, at 2,978 kilocalories per day per capita against 2,863 kilocalories per day per capita in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in calorie supply by food group between Bhutan and Ghana?
- 115 kilocalories per day per capita, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Ghana?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Ghana rank globally for calorie supply by food group?
- Bhutan ranks 10th and Ghana ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Calorie supply by food group. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.