Angola vs Sudan: Calorie supply by food group
Angola
2,238 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Sudan
2,224 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2022
Angola rank
130th
Sudan rank
133rd
Calorie supply by food group over time
- Angola
- Sudan
How they compare
Angola currently reports 2,238 kilocalories per day per capita against 2,224 kilocalories per day per capita in Sudan, a difference of 14 kilocalories per day per capita.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 130th and Sudan ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,259 kilocalories per day per capita | 2,150 kilocalories per day per capita | 109.49 kilocalories per day per capita | Angola |
| 2020s | 2,238 kilocalories per day per capita | 2,202 kilocalories per day per capita | 35.64 kilocalories per day per capita | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calorie supply by food group, Angola or Sudan?
- Angola, at 2,238 kilocalories per day per capita against 2,224 kilocalories per day per capita in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in calorie supply by food group between Angola and Sudan?
- 14 kilocalories per day per capita, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do Angola and Sudan rank globally for calorie supply by food group?
- Angola ranks 130th and Sudan ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Calorie supply by food group. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.