Which has higher bovine by nuts 2 region, Finland or Podlaskie (NUTS 2013)?

Podlaskie (NUTS 2013), at 712,670 against 568,730 in Finland as of 2016.

What is the difference in bovine by nuts 2 region between Finland and Podlaskie (NUTS 2013)?

143,940, with Podlaskie (NUTS 2013) ahead.

5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2016.

Eurostat, published as Bovine by NUTS 2 region. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Finland

568,730

in 2023

Podlaskie (NUTS 2013)

712,670

in 2016

Finland rank

19th

Podlaskie (NUTS 2013) rank

19th

Podlaskie (NUTS 2013) currently reports 712,670 against 568,730 in Finland, a difference of 143,940.

That makes Podlaskie (NUTS 2013)'s figure about 1.3 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 19th and Podlaskie (NUTS 2013) ranks 19th of 28 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Podlaskie (NUTS 2013) in 1.

Decade	Finland	Podlaskie (NUTS 2013)	Difference	Ahead
2000s	665,645	630,775	34,870	Finland
2010s	647,133	709,230	62,097	Podlaskie (NUTS 2013)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Which has higher bovine by nuts 2 region, Finland or Podlaskie (NUTS 2013)?: Podlaskie (NUTS 2013), at 712,670 against 568,730 in Finland as of 2016.
What is the difference in bovine by nuts 2 region between Finland and Podlaskie (NUTS 2013)?: 143,940, with Podlaskie (NUTS 2013) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Podlaskie (NUTS 2013)?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2016.
How do Finland and Podlaskie (NUTS 2013) rank globally for bovine by nuts 2 region?: Finland ranks 19th and Podlaskie (NUTS 2013) ranks 19th of 28 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Eurostat, published as Bovine by NUTS 2 region. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.