Mauritius vs Panama: Wild fish catch from bottom trawling
Mauritius
377.6 tonnes
in 2018
Panama
659.96 tonnes
in 2018
Mauritius rank
101st
Panama rank
99th
Wild fish catch from bottom trawling over time
- Mauritius
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 659.96 tonnes against 377.6 tonnes in Mauritius, a difference of 282.36 tonnes.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.7 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Panama ahead.
Mauritius ranks 101st and Panama ranks 99th of 111 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,464 tonnes | 2,783 tonnes | 1,319 tonnes | Panama |
| 2010s | 440.62 tonnes | 712.6 tonnes | 271.98 tonnes | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish catch from bottom trawling, Mauritius or Panama?
- Panama, at 659.96 tonnes against 377.6 tonnes in Mauritius as of 2018.
- What is the difference in wild fish catch from bottom trawling between Mauritius and Panama?
- 282.36 tonnes, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Panama?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Mauritius and Panama rank globally for wild fish catch from bottom trawling?
- Mauritius ranks 101st and Panama ranks 99th of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Wild fish catch from bottom trawling. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Bottom trawling is a fishing method in which a large, heavy net is dragged along the seafloor to catch fish and other marine life.