Latvia vs Mauritius: Wild fish catch from bottom trawling
Latvia
293.25 tonnes
in 2017
Mauritius
377.6 tonnes
in 2018
Latvia rank
102nd
Mauritius rank
101st
Wild fish catch from bottom trawling over time
- Latvia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 377.6 tonnes against 293.25 tonnes in Latvia, a difference of 84.35 tonnes.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 102nd and Mauritius ranks 101st of 111 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,295 tonnes | 1,464 tonnes | 169.31 tonnes | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 904.42 tonnes | 448.5 tonnes | 455.92 tonnes | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish catch from bottom trawling, Latvia or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 377.6 tonnes against 293.25 tonnes in Latvia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in wild fish catch from bottom trawling between Latvia and Mauritius?
- 84.35 tonnes, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritius?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Latvia and Mauritius rank globally for wild fish catch from bottom trawling?
- Latvia ranks 102nd and Mauritius ranks 101st of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Wild fish catch from bottom trawling. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Bottom trawling is a fishing method in which a large, heavy net is dragged along the seafloor to catch fish and other marine life.