Israel vs Mozambique: Wild fish catch from bottom trawling
Israel
1,255 tonnes
in 2018
Mozambique
1,887 tonnes
in 1992
Israel rank
92nd
Mozambique rank
89th
Wild fish catch from bottom trawling over time
- Israel
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 1,887 tonnes against 1,255 tonnes in Israel, a difference of 632 tonnes.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.5 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 92nd and Mozambique ranks 89th of 111 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 10,309 tonnes | 3,818 tonnes | 6,490 tonnes | Israel |
| 1980s | 11,330 tonnes | 3,243 tonnes | 8,086 tonnes | Israel |
| 1990s | 2,863 tonnes | 2,344 tonnes | 519.73 tonnes | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish catch from bottom trawling, Israel or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 1,887 tonnes against 1,255 tonnes in Israel as of 1992.
- What is the difference in wild fish catch from bottom trawling between Israel and Mozambique?
- 632 tonnes, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Mozambique?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 1992.
- How do Israel and Mozambique rank globally for wild fish catch from bottom trawling?
- Israel ranks 92nd and Mozambique ranks 89th of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Wild fish catch from bottom trawling. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Bottom trawling is a fishing method in which a large, heavy net is dragged along the seafloor to catch fish and other marine life.